Discussion about this post

User's avatar
ItsMeNikey's avatar

I appreciate this post and your reflection. I agree that talking about this openly is proactive. I understand the instinct to focus outrage on the clear perpetrators.

At the same time, I struggle with the idea that we should be careful not to let our outrage spill beyond “monsters.” When multiple respected teachers are exposed, and when we have seen cases where the men involved were ordinary and well regarded in their communities, it becomes harder to draw a clean line.

In the Pelicot case, the men were not powerful elites. They were nurses, teachers, firefighters, fathers. Hundreds more saw and did nothing.

I am honestly trying to understand how we distinguish between a few aberrant individuals and a broader cultural problem without minimizing the scale of harm. How do you think about that?

(See: “What would a woman do to an unconscious man if she thought no one would find out?” - Anna Wharton, Dec 19, 2024

And

https://celestemdavis.substack.com/p/epstein-files-patriarchy?r=1k2f4&utm_medium=ios

That references a note from Magdelénat:

“There’s an interaction I think back to every time we are collectively confronted with the utterly habitual nature of male violence against women. It was at a conference a year or so ago by Le Monde journalist Lorraine de Foucher, who won a Pulitzer for her coverage of the porn industry, child prostitution and sex trafficking in France.

The Pelicot trials came up during the Q&A, and a seventy-something man in the front row timidly raised his hand. You could tell he was carefully phrasing his question and choosing his words as he was saying them.

He said: « So, let me get this right. In the fairly small town of Mazan, Dominique Pélicot easily found 90+ men willing to rape his wife while she was drugged and unconscious. Hundreds more saw the messages on the forum and not one decided to tell the police about it. »

At that point, a lot of us were kind of bracing for either a dismissal of the facts, or some convoluted explanation for how those men were unique. But no. He continued:

« So, does that mean that in every town, every village in our country, there are just as many men willing to rape an unconscious woman? »

Lorraine de Foucher replied, « Yes. »

« But then that means that there are thousands, tens of thousands, maybe hundreds of thousands! » (You could hear at that point the wheels turning in his head).

« Yes », she nodded again.

« But… that’s abominable! It’s a catastrophe! It’s a national emergency! »

« …… Yes. It is. » - Mélina Magdelénat

.

Heather Briann's avatar

I am grateful you are here and wrote this Daniel. Here with you. ✨

3 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?